Farmfarmerlandownerleasepicturepro revengeredditSTORIEStop

Farmer’s Lease Wasn’t Going To Be Renewed By The Landowner, So He Decided To Destroy The Crops He Had Planted

Sometimes farmers don’t own the land where they grow crops. Instead, they lease the land and give the landowner a portion of the profits.

In today’s story, a farmer’s lease is about to end, and he decides to get revenge on the landowner by destroying the crops.

Let’s see what happened…

Cancel a land lease and hope to make a windfall? Hope you like a lot of dirt.

In case you weren’t aware, it’s very common in agricultural communities to have what are known as ‘farmer’s schools’.

That’s not a technical term, but more just something easy to define them.

The schools are generally organized by the local farmers, and while you still study the various courses needed to get into college, you also study farming technology courses, and get credit hours for work study (IE working on one or more farms).

The area I lived in was surrounded by a number of large farms which grew cotton primarily. So during the year, we’d spend time out in the field both tilling, planting, and harvesting.

The farmer at one of the farms gave the students surprising instructions.

One of the farms near the school was this thousand acre spread that like the others grew mostly cotton, though sometimes they rotated to soybeans, or silage. (Basically corn, but you don’t harvest it.)

This farm had a long partnership with the school, so the students provided near free labor for the farmer.

The farmer leased this property from some out of state owner, and paid them a portion of the revenue from the harvest.

Imagine my surprise then, when I and many of my classmates arrived at the farm to do our work study, and the farmer instructed some to crew the sprayers and start spraying herbicide on the fields, while others (myself included) were to take tractors and discs and plow everything under.

The farmer wanted every square inch of the fields returned to just dirt.

The farmer paid the students well for their work.

We were shocked, to say the least, but after some discussion we set to work.

It took us the better part of a weekend to do so, and when we were done the field was in a beautiful, if barren, state.

The farmer thanked each of us personally, and paid us about 500 dollars each. (Quite the sum for a 90’s high school senior).

We returned to the school, told our headmaster that the ‘contract’ was completed, and he informed us that the farmer would no longer be working with the school, and we’d be sent to one of the other larger farms for the rest of the year and our work study.

OP explains why the farmer wanted to destroy the crop.

It was probably two or three months later before word started going around about why we’d been instructed to destroy the crop.

Granted, these were just rumors, but based on how things turned out for the farmer, I suspect there’s some truth to it.

So, apparently the landowner had decided that he was going to not renew the lease the farmer had on the land.

This lease renewal just so happened to fall a few weeks before harvest season would start.

Given that the average cotton farm earns about 1,500 dollars per acre, a 1000 acre farm would easily net the owner 1.5 million dollars. About 500k of that being pure profit.

I don’t know what the farmer’s lease was, but it stands to reason that it wasn’t anywhere near that.

So this landowner had figured out a neat little ‘trick’. Let the farmer get a good crop planted, and then refuse to renew the lease.

The farmer would leave the plants in the field, and the landowner would just need to pay some contractors to come harvest it, and they’d earn a profit.

The farmer got revenge on the landowner, and OP learned a life lesson.

Since at the time, the farmer’s lease wasn’t yet up, he decided to prevent that from happening. His act of revenge against the owner, was to prevent them from cashing in on their hard work.

Sure, it destroyed his farm, and he had to sell off most everything he owned to buy some property for himself, but he’d proved a point.

The owner did try to sue the farmer, though he (the owner) really didn’t have a leg to stand on, or so I was told.

I think the court ruled that since the farmer was still under the lease when he had the land tilled under, then it was his property to do with as he wished, and thus the landowner couldn’t tell him what to do with his property.

I learned a rather valuable lesson from that man, beyond what I learned about farming. That lesson was, never…ever cross someone with nothing to lose.

The farmer was smart to prevent the landowner from benefiting from his work.

Let’s see how Reddit reacted to this story…

This reader shared a similar situation about a TV show.

Another reader wonders if the farmer could’ve harvested the crop early.

This person thinks the farmer never should’ve signed the lease.

Here’s the perspective of a farmer…

The law might’ve been on the farmer’s side.

It’s a good revenge story, but the farmer probably should’ve talked to a lawyer.

If you liked that post, check out this story about a guy who was forced to sleep on the couch at his wife’s family’s house, so he went to a hotel instead.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Back to top button

Adblock Detected

Block the adblockers from browsing the site, till they turn off the Ad Blocker.