Posted by msmash from the balancing-acts dept.
The United Nations is set to vote on a treaty later this year intended to create norms for fighting cybercrime — and the Biden administration is fretting over whether to sign on. Politico: The uncertainty over the treaty stems from fears that countries including Russia, Iran and China could use the text as a guise for U.N. approval of their widespread surveillance measures and suppression of the digital rights of their citizens. If the United States chooses not to vote in favor of the treaty, it could become easier for these adversarial nations — named by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency as the biggest state sponsors of cybercrime — to take the lead on cyber issues in the future. And if the U.S. walks away from the negotiating table now, it could upset other nations that spent several years trying to nail down the global treaty with competing interests in mind.
While the treaty is not set for a vote during the U.N. General Assembly this week, it’s a key topic of debate on the sidelines, following meetings in New York City last week, and committee meetings set for next month once the world’s leaders depart. The treaty was troubled from its inception. A cybercrime convention was originally proposed by Russia, and the U.N. voted in late 2019 to start the process to draft it — overruling objections by the U.S. and other Western nations. Those countries were worried Russia would use the agreement as an alternative to the Budapest Convention — an existing accord on cybercrime administered by the Council of Europe, which Russia, China and Iran have not joined.
After any salary raise, you will have less money at the end of the month than you did before.
Working…
